The Solari Report:
Money Maps of the World

Population Data (2014)

Australia Brazil Canada China France Germany India Italy Japan Mexico Russia SAfrica UK US
Population (MM)1 23.6 202.0 35.5 1,393.8 64.6 82.6 1,267.4 61.6 126.9 123.8 142.5 53.1 63.5 322.6
Urban Population1 21.2 172.5 28.7 756.3 56.4 61.4 410.4 42,189 118.0 97.7 105.9 33.6 50.8 268.1
Median Age1 43.0 30.7 40.3 36.7 40.8 45.9 26.6 44.5 46.2 27.3 38.9 26.2 40.4 37.6
Billionaires ($USD) 9 29 65 32 152 43 85 56 35 27 16 111 4 (2012) 47 492
Internet Users8 21.1 107.8 33.0 641.6 55.4 71.7 243.1 36 109.2 50.9 84.4 24.9 57.0 279.8
English Speaking12 97 5 85 1 39 56 12 34   5 5 29 98 95

 

Natural Resources

Australia Brazil Canada China France Germany India Italy Japan Mexico Russia SAfrica UK US
Land Area
(MM sq km) 1
 
7,740 8,514 9,970 9,597 552 357 3,287 301 378 1,958 17,076 1,221 242,900 9,629
Arable Land (%)2   6.2 8.5 4.3 11.6 33.5 33.2 47.9 22.6 11.2 12.9 7.1 9.9 24.9 16.2
Renewable Water
Resources
(cu km, 2011) 2
 
492 8,233 2,902 2,840 211 154 1,911 191.3 430 457.2 4,508 51.4 147 3,069
Coastline (km) 2   25,760 7,491 202,080 14,500 4,853 2,389 7,000 7,600 29,751 9,330 37,653 2,798 12,429 19,924
Waterways (km)2   2,000 50,000 * 636 ** 110,000 8,501 7,467 14,500 2,400 1,770 2,900 102,000 n/a 3,200 41,009
Crude Oil
(bbl, Jan, 2013) 2
 
1.4 B 13.1 B 173.1 B 17.3 B 85.1 MM 254.2 MM 5.4 B 521.3 MM 44.1 B 10.2 B 80.0 B 15.0 MM 3.1 B 20.6 B
Natural Gas
(cu m, Jan, 2013) 2
 
1.219 T 395.5 B 1.93 T 3.1 T 10.7 B 125 B 1.241 T 62.35 B 20.9 B 487.7 B 47.8 T 16 B 244 B 9.459 T

 

Infrastructure

Australia Brazil Canada China France Germany India Italy Japan Mexico Russia SAfrica UK US
Railways (km)2   38,445 28,538 46,552 86,000 29,640 41,981 63,974 20,255 27,182 17,166 87,157 20,192 16,454 224,792
Roadways
(paved, km) 2
 
356,343 212,798 415,600 3,453,890 1,028,446 645,000 n/a 487,700 973,234 137,544 927,721 62,995 394,428 4,304,715
Pipelines
(km, gas / oil) 2
 
30,931
/ 3,791
17,915
/ 9,553
n/a 48,511 /
38,410
15,322 /
8,023
27,022 /
7,313
15,644 /
20,032
20,223 /
2,967
4,456 /
278
2,102 /
16,832
165,372 /
94,518
1,387 /
2,452
29,173 /
10,605
1,984,321 /
240,711
# of Smart
Phones (2013) 7
 
64.6 MM 278 MM 26 MM 1,227 MM 72 MM 107 MM 924 MM 89 MM 121 MM 92 MM 256 MM 59 MM 83 MM 327 MM
# of Satellites 5   15 14 42 237 69 64 69 33 191 7 4012 3 44 2092

 

Finance

Australia Brazil Canada China France Germany India Italy Japan Mexico Russia SAfrica UK US
GDP (trillions,
2013 est.) 2
 
$1.0T $2.4T $1.5T $13.4T $2.2T $3.2T $5.0T 1.8T $4.7T $1.8T $2.5T $0.6T $2.3T $16.7T
GDP Per Capita
(2013 est.) 2
 
$43,000 $12,100 $43,100 $9,800 $35,700 $39,500 $4,000 $29,600 $37,100 $15,600 $18,100 $11,500 $37,300 $52,800
Debt (% of GDP,
2013 est.) 2
 
32.6% 59.2% 86.3% 22.4% 93.4% 79.9% 51.8% 133% 226.1% 37.7% 7.9% 45.4% 91.1% 71.8%
Exports (2013 est.) 2   $251.7B $244.8B $458.7B $2.21T $578.6B $1.493T $313.2B $474B $697B $370B $515B $91.05B $813.2B $1.575T
Outstanding
Equity (2012) 10
 
$1.3T $1.2T $2.0T $3.7T $1.8T $1.5T $1.3T $480B $3.7T $525B $874B $612B $3.0T $18.7T
Gold Reserves
(tonnes, 2014) 3
 
79.9 67.2 3.0 1,054.1 2,435.4 3,384.2 557.7 2,451.8 765.2 123.1 1,168.0 125.2 310.3 8,133.5

 

Military

Australia Brazil Canada China France Germany India Italy Japan Mexico Russia SAfrica UK US
US Military Personnel
Deployed (Sept, 2014)
13
173   131     38,826   11,317 49,503       9,231 1,161,973
Military (% of GDP, 2013) 2   1.6% 1.4% 1.0% 2.1% 2.2% 1.3% 2.4% 1.69% 1.0% 0.6% 4.2% 1.2% 2.2% 3.8%
Nuclear Warheads11   0 0 0 250 300 0 90–110 0 0 0 8,000 0 225 7,315 ***
# of Aircraft Carriers 4   0 1 0 1 1 0 2 2 0 0 1 0 0 10
Space Budget (2010) 6   35 MM   274 MM   1.4B 1.2B   847 MM 2.2B   2.6B   303 MM 10.8B

Sources:

  1 worldometers.info,   2 World Factbook,   3 The World Gold Council,   4 wikipedia.org,   5 satellitedebris.net   6oecd-ilibrary.org,   7wikipedia.org,   8a href="http://www.internetlivestats.com/internet-users-by-country/" target="_blank">internetlivestats.com,   9wikipedia.org   10The World Bank   11icanw.org   12wikipedia.org   13wikipedia.org

* Most in areas remote from industry and population
** Saint Lawrence Seaway of 3,769 km, including the Saint Lawrence River of 3,058 km, shared with United States
*** (5) European nations host U.S. nuclear weapons on their soil as part of a NATO nuclear-sharing arrangement: Belgium, Germany, Italy, Netherlands, Turkey

Australia

Australia is a member in good standing of the Anglo-American alliance (UK, US, Canada, Australia, New Zealand). Rich in natural resources, it has benefited from development in Asia, particularly China. Australia is the driest inhabited continent on earth, making it particularly vulnerable to the challenges of weather and climate. Finally, as one New Zealander once mentioned, "we are dealing with long supply lines down under."

Brazil

Brazil is the “B” in “BRICS.” Brazil has pursued industrial and agricultural growth while taking advantage of its rich land and natural resources to become Latin America’s leading economy. It has a young population and a wealth of land and renewable water resources. A slow-down in Chinese growth and the fall in commodity prices has impacted Brazil’s economy, including its mining sector.

Canada

Canada is rich in land and natural resources. The Canadian economy is highly integrated with the United States, with which it shares the world’s longest unfortified border. It must grapple with the politics of a francophone Quebec and managing the distances of its territories (Canada has a population of approximately 4 people per square km, compared to 8 for Russia, 33 for the US and 147 for China) and the environmental impact of developing diverse energy resources. As with most of the countries in the developed world, it faces the challenge of managing an aging population.

China

China is shifting from a centrally owned and planned economy to a more market-oriented economy. Its growth has been significant since the 1990s. China’s GDP surpassed Japan’s in 2001 (Japan is now fourth behind India) to become the second largest global economy and then surpassed the US in late 2014 to become the world’s largest economy. Coincidentally, this is a status it enjoyed more than a century ago prior to the industrial revolution.

China’s challenges are:

  • Managing the world’s largest population.
  • Dealing with the environmental stress of rapid industrialization and growth.
  • Rebalancing its economic relationships with the US and Europe as internal consumer markets grow.

Recommended: Solari Report Interview with Steve Roach on his book on the rebalancing of the US China trade, Unbalanced.

Steven Roach’s statistics on the rebalancing which is currently underway between West and East are compelling:

"The United States, with only 4.5 percent of the world’s population, spent $10.7 trillion on personal consumption in 2011, accounting for 17 percent of global consumer demand. U.S. consumption is nearly 35 percent larger than pan-European consumption, even though Europe’s population is slightly larger than that of the United States. It is four times that of China and India combined, even though those countries account for close to 40 percent of the world’s population, nearly nine times that of the United States."

Roach, Stephen (2014-01-28). Unbalanced: The Codependency of America and China (p. 10). Yale University Press. Kindle Edition.

As emerging market consumers begin to increase their share of global consumption, less of their savings may be available to buy government bonds. And these bonds finance subsidies which support the continued consumption of Westerners.

Look at the number of Chinese who now have a smart phone and are on the Internet. The growth of the Asian online market, surpassing the US and Europe in size is a recent phenomenon. This is a profound change – and it has just begun.

France

France is a player. It is a permanent member of:

  • The United Nations Security Council
  • NATO
  • The G-7
  • The G-20
  • The EU

One of the goals of the creation of the European Union was to achieve the economic integration of Europe by combining France and Germany into a common market and currency.

France’s leadership in nuclear technology has provided relative energy independence. France also enjoys a high percentage of arable land while their leadership in fashion, fine food and wine commands a surprising share of equity value in global financial markets.

Germany

Germany is Europe’s economic powerhouse with a strong base in manufacturing and technology.

The decline of the USSR and the end of the Cold War allowed for German unification in 1990. Since then, Germany has expended considerable funds to bring Eastern productivity and wages up to Western standards.

Recommended Solari Report Interviews:

In January 1999, Germany, France and nine other EU countries introduced a common European exchange currency, the euro.

A critical geopolitical question is whether Germany will remain part of an integrated European Union in closer alliance with the Anglo-American countries or draw closer to Russia and China as Eurasia develops.

Russia, which supplies approximately 25% of gas demand for continental Europe and as much as 50% of Germany’s demands, would benefit from access to German technology. The United States is particularly concerned regarding a potential German-Russian alliance. Hence, the importance of recent developments with NATO, the Ukraine and “pipeline politics.”

Germany’s population has the second highest median age within the G-7 after Japan: 45.9 years.

India

India is the “I” in “BRICS” – its economy is the third largest in the world. India has 1.3 billion people, slightly less than China’s 1.4 billion. That is a lot of people. Approximately two thirds of India’s population is rural. That compares to approximately 45% for China, 16% for the US and 7% for Japan. This, in part, explains why India’s GDP per capita is less than half of that of China’s.

Indians have traditionally been small farmers. The WTO’s efforts to industrialize global agriculture have come to a grinding stall in India, marked by rising farmer suicide rates and political opposition, contributing to the failure to date of the WTO’s Doha round.

Highly Recommended: Sir James Goldsmith's Globalization Warning

India is currently in a period of growth. In part, G-7 alliances with India are designed to offset the growing power of China. India has numerous advantages including significant arable land and a population with a young median age.

The country’s challenges include building an infrastructure to support a modern economy and to lower their high poverty rates.

Italy

As with the other Southern nations in Europe, the creation of the European Union has not been to Italy’s advantage. Following Japan, Italy is struggling with the second highest debt load in the G-7 (133% of GDP) as well an aging population.

The Vatican is a separate, sovereign state located within the city of Rome. Who knows what it might do to Italy’s financial statistics if the Vatican were integrated into this data!

Japan

Japan, the fourth largest national economy in the world, faces tough geography and demographics.

The country is dependent on imported fossil fuels and the Japanese median age is the highest of the G-7: 46.2 years. Japan also has a frightening amount of debt per capita: 226.1%. Add to these issues the ongoing crisis surrounding Fukushima. And finally, there is the insecurity of being a small nation who must manage tensions in the South China Sea with numerous neighbors including two that have nuclear arsenals: China and North Korea.

Japanese science, technology and engineering continue to astonish and accomplish amazing things. During 2014, a Japanese company announced plans to complete a space elevator by the year 2050. Who knows – perhaps all of us traveling to the moon will have to land in Tokyo before rising to the suborbital platforms.

Mexico

As the Bretton Woods global “free market” system frays (or perhaps even unravels) expect to see North American outsourcing move closer to home by switching to Mexico. Indeed, the economic integration of the United States and Mexico continues, regardless of what the politicians say.

I believe that part of this integration is financed with narcotics trafficking. The US opens its markets up to drugs and this, in turn, finances its acquisition of land, real estate and equity investment in Mexico. This means that there is little political incentive to rein in the drug cartels but plenty of cash-flow to build out additional US infrastructure in Mexico.

The direction of US immigration is clear from looking at the median ages of Mexico and the United States. The US median age is 37 and Mexico’s median age is 27. By encouraging the immigration of young people from Mexico, the US can shore up its economy, its housing sector and its Social Security system.

Watch for investments in railroads, ports and roads between Mexico and the United States. Big bets are happening here. Among other things, this will create a powerful constituency for a Jeb Bush presidency. His wife is Mexican and he and his brother were governors in states with very high Hispanic populations.

The power and importance to the United States of secure Southern borders – Cuba to the East and Mexico to the West – is ever more important, fueling economic integration. This is one of the reasons why it was so important for a variety of interests to assert control over and to reengineer the port of New Orleans following hurricane Katrina.

Russia

To understand Russia it is essential to understand the vast distances of its territory. Russia is almost twice the size of China or the United States. A lot of that territory is cold and inhospitable. This makes it a difficult nation to conquer as Napoleon and Hitler discovered at great cost to their armies (and to the Russian people).

Russia is rich in natural resources, particularly fossil fuels. That makes its economy highly dependent on the commodities markets and vulnerable to swings in the price of oil and gas. Driving the oil and gas price down was the strategy that fractured the Soviet Union.

Recommended: The Oil Card Interviews with Jim Norman

After the Soviet Union dissolved, privatization efforts led by US and Western investment interests asserted private control of a significant portion of Russian assets, working through the so-called "oligarchs."

Recommended: Russia and the Ukraine Backstory with Anne Williamson

This has enabled the United States and its allies to maintain a high oil price to help manage China. However, as Russia’s oil and gas revenues have helped its leadership maintain national sovereignty, its oil and gas sales to Europe have strengthened its relationship with Germany and Europe. As a result, growing tensions with the United States and, subsequently, between the EU and Russia have emerged.

Recommended: The Oil Card – What’s Next with Jim Norman

Russia has very little debt: 8% of GDP. That means their governmental ability to withstand economic sanctions is high. However, their private debt is much higher. Russia has also maintained a strong military capacity with the benefit of technology and intellectual capital developed during the Cold War. They have more satellites and more warheads than the United States. However, like the Chinese, they have a single aircraft carrier. The United States continues to maintain a dominant position in policing the global sea lanes.

Russia’s greatest challenge is long-term. They face a declining population but do not currently have the capacity to attract the immigration which Europe and the United States do. In response to their current situation, Russia is playing a leadership role within the BRICS nations to create new financial, payment and communication systems outside a US dollar-centric system.

South Africa

A review of investor returns from the 1800’s to the present reveals that South Africa is in the lead, a reminder of Franklin Sanders comment that "wealth comes from what men take from the ground." For many decades, South Africa has been an important source of diamonds and is currently one of the world’s largest producers of platinum, gold and chromium. China has surpassed South Africa as the largest gold producer.

Africa is enjoying increased investment – that works to South Africa’s advantage. However, it is struggling with an unstable electrical power system and very high unemployment. This is a country that could benefit by putting its population to work building reliable energy systems and a more advanced infrastructure.

United Kingdom

Based on data from Forbes, our money map indicates that the United States has the highest concentration of billionaires. However, in my experience, billionaires prefer to go unnoticed. I suspect, for example, that there are many more billionaires in China than those shown in the figures above. Indeed, the recent documentary Red Obsession claims that there are more billionaires in China then in the United States.

However, it would not surprise me if there were more billionaires in the City of London than in all of China and the United States combined. Like the Vatican and the US black budget, the City of London figures are also excluded from those listed for the UK. We suspect that such "data free zones" along with many offshore havens (including those set up and protected by the Anglo American alliance and the US Navy) constitute enormous networks of hidden finance and dark pools of capital.

I believe that the role which the City of London and New York play in the global financial markets creates a mechanism through which the UK has far more global clout than statistics would indicate (as there are few publicly available statistics on many inter-generational pools of capital).

However, even looking at publicly available statistics, the British are impressive. With a landmass equivalent to 3% of the United States and a population 20% of that of the US, they manage to produce an equivalent of 14% of the GNP, 16% of the equity market capitalization and 52% of the exports.

When reviewing the statistics for both the United Kingdom and Japan, it is worth pondering how island nations can produce such powerful export economies. The economics of those exports grew up around a low-cost Bretton Woods system of global trade. If that system unravels, export economies may change in significant ways.

United States

The United States has arguably the greatest strategic piece of real estate on the planet.

First and foremost, it is secure. It has the Atlantic on one side and the Pacific on the other. It has a secure border with Canada, with a language, culture and economy well-integrated with the United States. It enjoys strong relations and economic integration with Mexico. It has little need to worry about national security threats from its Southwestern borders. The recent announcements regarding its relations with Cuba indicate a desire to ensure similar security on its Southeast coast.

Second, the US has rich, arable land and water sources, including navigable rivers. Combined with significant investment in roads, railroads and airports, it has a highly economic internal transportation infrastructure for agriculture and manufacturing.

Third, it has been able to maintain a motivated, well-educated work force by attracting and educating young people globally. Some of these people return home to build American-friendly businesses and institutions and some stay to replenish the US residential population.

Fourth, it is developing its sizable domestic oil and gas reserves and is moving towards energy self-sufficiency. Energy costs for US manufacturers are significantly lower than for Asian or European counterparts.

Fifth, it fields the largest military capacity globally, by sea, air and standing army. While its borders are secure, its aircraft carrier fleet and Navy give it the ability to project power globally. That capacity has been badly stretched and bogged down in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Perhaps more important, it is the global leader in so called “black budget technology” and invisible weaponry. US interests can blackmail and kill while making these events look like accidents or natural disasters to the general population.

As does Europe, the US maintains a global satellite GPS system.

The US also faces significant challenges. It now has a large and growing number of retirees whose government and private pensions have been compromised by the “financial coup d’état” and an ongoing policy of currency debasement. This population has lived – by global standards – in the lap of luxury. How they are going to adapt to the ongoing adjustment in living standards is a serious political question.

The US also faces an inability to maintain the Post WWII Bretton Woods system. Consequently, that system unraveling and inspiring comments on a “New World Disorder.” But the US still enjoys the benefits of managing the global currency and maintaining the diminished global trade system.

The US is responding domestically as it is globally – with a wide portfolio of overt and covert force. In part, this may be the result of allowing the growth of a very expensive private national security corporate infrastructure that has taken on a parasitic life of its own. In the process, the US is debasing its food and educational systems, which makes it harder to solve problems with innovation and technological prowess, potentially increasing its dependence on force.

On one hand, the US elites are in an extremely advantageous position as a result of their real estate, natural resources and infrastructure. But they face significant risks. They could potentially destroy their global franchise by unsuccessfully using greater amounts of force to provide a high standard of living for 1) unproductive parts of their corporate infrastructure and 2) an aging population. This population no longer contributes economically and its retirement assets have been shifted out-of-range to ensure US primacy in the global investment infrastructure.

Having unleashed investment and securitization through the emerging markets, the question remains by what means the Anglo-American alliance intends to maintain its leadership – by force or innovation?

Numerous financial commentators are appalled by the US use of force and related debasement of economic and cultural resources. However, these commentators are ignorant of the black budget weaponry which gives the Anglo-American alliance primacy. And they have neglected to take into account the advantages which the US enjoys as a result of its geography.

© Solari, Inc. 2015