Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 8032 look at the undocumented adjustments between fiscal 1998 and today, what we have counted and is publicly documented is $21.2 trillion. You add the $27 trillion of bailouts that is $48 trillion dollars that has been handed out. If we have a pot, and take out $40 trillion dollars and say, “You know something? We have no money left, just debt. We need a balanced bud- get amendment so that we can abrogate all the contracts that we’ve promised to you guys.” My attitude is, “No, we don’t need to keep paying money into a system that just stole $48+ trillion.” We don’t need to keep paying taxes into something that stole $50 trillion, let alone that is going to abrogate its obligations to us. I don’t need a balanced budget amendment. I need to know where that missing money went and get it back. And I can get it back because I can get back the equity ownership of the assets purchased or created with it. I don’t have to get cash. I can get back $50 tril- lion worth of assets. A good conservative wants to know where the money is and to get it back. Farrell: Exactly. I’ll tell you something. This was the subtext, I think, that was going on in the Clinton/Trump debate on Monday night. Fitts: Yes. Farrell: This was the subtext. You will notice that what Trump kept harping on was running the numbers. He even said at one time, “I’m a numbers guy,” if I remember correctly. Fitts: Do you remember when he said, “Look, we spent $6 trillion on Iraq. We could have fixed the country up twice for that amount of money. And what do we have to show for that $6 trillion? Nothing. Then you go to Europe and Dubai, and they are first world countries. We look like a third world country when we could have fixed ourselves up with that $6 trillion. What do we have to show for all your waste of money?” That was a politically safe, correct way of saying, “You just stole $50 trillion. We have nothing to show for it. The country looks like a third world country in different places. We certainly don’t compare to Europe or parts of the Middle East, and certainly not to parts of Asia. It’s time we held you accountable for that.” I couldn’t agree more. Farrell: I agree with him, too, but the debate has real subtext between the two candidates. I think Trump knows something, and I think that the others know that he knows it. This has been the bellwether of his whole campaign. He has turned the campaign into a referendum. I’ve said over and over that I don’t view this elec- tion as simply an election; it’s a referendum on concepts. The concepts are: Do we want more of Mr. Global or his globalism, or do we want to take control of our economic future and reassert our sovereignty over it? It’s really a referendum about that. Fitts: I think it’s a referendum about centraliza- tion, which has a negative return on investment versus a system that has a positive return. I think Trump is an equity guy. I don’t think Trump or anybody is against globalization as long as it has a positive return on investment. But what we’re doing is centralizing in a way that has a negative return on investment. Everybody knows negative returns on investment end in depopulation or death for most people. Farrell: Yes, exactly. And Mr. Global’s agenda are centralization and depopulation. Well, as I pointed out, depopulation as a meme has been pressed by the central banking wealthy oligar- chy since the Republic of Venice. Malthus or Rockefeller didn’t invent it. Of course, the de- population estimates are always wrong because estimating occurs in terms of a closed system of economics and finance when the reality is that technologies change. As technologies change, the financial system must change with them. They’re operating with an old paradigm, and this is the problem. It’s coming unglued, and they don’t know what to do. Fitts: The thing that most concerns me when I put together all the stories for cut and run is health freedom. The “Zika psyop,” has no ex- planation other than that elites need to lower life II. News Trends & Stories I WANT MY MONEY BACK!