Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 8051 National Committee. In other words, think twice before you join this rush to the cashless society. You could be hacked overnight and lose everything. Don’t buy this central banking meme of more secure systems. On top of this, we’ve seen something else hap- pen. It is space related as well: China launched the world’s first quantum communications satel- lite. Well, what is quantum communications? Essentially, you’re using the phenomenon of entanglement to encrypt information. If you do not have the key, you cannot crack a communi- cation from point A to point B. So, the Chinese are taking first steps of a secure system of inter- national financial clearing. Meanwhile, we’ve seen articles recently about the insecurity of SWIFT – the big financial clearing- house in Brussels. What amazes me is how the pattern of hacks suggests that someone is trying to map the internet – for whatever purpose – and that same someone wants to show people that the entire cyber system is insecure. In addition to mapping the Internet, I think that someone is trying to show that this system has so many holes. Someone is waging a PsyOp and a psywar against Mr. Global by all these hacks demonstrating a destructive capability that can- not reassure to Mr. Global. Fitts: Right. Farrell: I think this is a big issue. I think it is – along with space – perhaps the issue that we have to look at very carefully because it is only going to increase. That is my prediction. I would try to keep your savings accounts and so on out of the major banks for that reason. They are prime targets for these groups. They are leaking sieves. Your local credit union isn’t going to be so much a target of these types of things. Fitts: Right. This is another argument for decen- tralization. Farrell: Exactly. This has the feel of an opera- tion, whoever is behind it, to wreck and disorder the internet, but also to publicize how central- ized systems are not secure. Somebody wants to drive the system out of the internet center into regional and local centers. Time will tell. Fitts: Economy – is it open or closed? You and I have talked a lot about who owns the debt and, is it other humans, or is there somebody else – other civilizations – owning the debt? I published my unanswered questions about Wells Fargo and started asking whether Wells Fargo is also creating mortgages on those ac- counts that the Fed is buying. Suddenly – voila! An article comes out saying, “Former Wall Street banker suggests global debt may not be owned by humans,” which story spreads widely. Farrell: I saw it! Fitts: I interpret the story to mean the elites don’t want me asking questions about Wells Fargo and mortgages before the election. Farrell: Exactly. Fitts: But here is the funny thing: I thought, “You’re trying to make me out to be crazy. Not a problem. I’ll take it because your numbers don’t add up and mine do.” Farrell: Exactly. Fitts: I’m prepared to have this conversation with people who really want to know how money works. We’ve seen a couple of big presentations recently. Steven Greer recorded a four-hour conversation last year, a sort-of history of the national security state. If you don’t understand this, it’s not a bad history. Then Richard put out a summary, and he did a very good interview on the day after disclosure and where this all fits into global geo- politics. You’re seeing more and more synthesized pre- sentations for the sophisticated audience, helping them understand the history since World War II in a way that they could grasp. Do you see any more understanding in your au- dience about this question of whether the econ- omy is open or closed? Farrell: Yes, I do. In fact, it’s almost a steady subject of conversation on my website and in our so-called vidchats. Increasingly I think people “ Think twice before you join this rush to the cashless society. You could be hacked overnight and lose everything. ”