Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 8041 standardize military equipment, to create their trans-European military under Franco-German leadership, which means the end of NATO. This way European sidesteps and bypasses NATO, and bypasses Washington and Mr. Global. Fitts: One other thing – Let’s come to the elec- tion because we are going to publish this in the first two weeks of October, and the election is November 8th. I saw a new survey of global investors, and it’s a poll of their top 10 - 20 risk issues that concern them. Their number one risk is the US election. I think it’s what Peggy Noonan called, “We have a choice between a criminal and a crazy person.” The criminal understands elite policies of the syndicate whereas the other candidate does not. We all know that the first candidate, if need be, will start World War III with Russia to protect syndicate interests. I don’t think most people are completely aware of how bizarre the syndicate is. Either way, I think that their concern is that we are coming into unpredictable change that we don’t understand. It may just be grief that they are starting to realize the party is over, and we’re not going to keep centralizing, because it means destroying the living systems and the real wealth on the planet. The one thing that I can say about this election, other than being Monica Lewinsky II, we have a choice between the criminal syndicate and change. Investors are concerned about change. I would argue that they should be concerned about the real fundamentals.. What do you think is going to happen? Farrell: In the election, I honestly don’t know. I still think people think Trump won the debate overwhelmingly – which shocks me – people think that Trump won, and sometimes by very wide margins. Fitts: Last night I went to look at a website that ranked 20 polls, and I went through all of them. Trump had won anywhere from a little to a large margin, even on websites that I would consider Democrat. Today when I looked at CNN and the major press, it was, “Oh, Clinton really won.” Wait a minute. That’s not what any of the polls last night showed, so it was very strange. Farrell: Well, they are living in make believe – the mainstream media. I don’t see or sense all that much support for Hillary other than from the oligarchs who view Trump as such a wild- card. But I don’t think that means that they are enthusiastic for Hillary. Fitts: Right. Farrell: But, I think there is real danger that if they sense a Trump victory, that they might pull some sort of fast one. The more basic problem is geopolitics and international markets. If Hillary gets in, the Russians have already signaled, as far as Russia is concerned, they will hunker down and brace themselves for a war. Fitts: Right. Farrell: That is a very real possibility, and I can tell you, that if that happens I do not think that the United States would win. If we managed to avoid nuclear weapons I don’t see Europe going along with us. I just do not foresee support from Germany. We would need the support of the two European powers, and I don’t see the sup- port from Germany, or France. I think we would be isolating ourselves much more than we are now. And we would have to forget Japan too. Fitts: Right. Farrell: I really don’t see that. We’re trying to stabilize the Pacific, and go to war with Russia. Neither Australia nor New Zealand nor the Phil- ippines nor Indonesia would side with us. The neocon faction of the American deep state might want war, but it cannot coerce all our al- lies into going along. The alternative is Trump. I think that he might actually win. If that happens, geopolitically I think you’re looking at a more stable world. I really do. I don’t think that he is interested in confrontations with Russia because he’s a cost-benefit analysis type of person, and he is not “ If Hillary gets in, the Russians have already signaled, as far as Russia is concerned, they will hunker down and brace themselves for a war. ”