Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 8035 “ “What are we get- ting for our money?” Well, we’re getting the F-35 fighter, which has so far been a trillion-dollar boondoggle. It still doesn’t work. ” is osteoporosis. It atrophies muscles and bone structure. The researchers must find a way to sustaining a human presence in deep space. Well, the Russians already know the remedy is to create a strong electromagnetic field that re- produces climate conditions on Earth so that you don’t subject yourself to all of these health issues in outer space. All of that is very interesting, that you would have these announcements coming out of Russia, and then NASA saying, “We’re testing the EmDrive.” There have also been stories of putting human beings into suspended animation for space travel, and waking them when they arrive. They’re talking about all these things that they’ve known for a long time and they’re just cluing us in. The technologies that they’re bringing online publicly have existed all along, and they will take us into space. Fitts: The Russians are embarrassing them into admitting that they have to have it? Farrell: Oh, yes. This is precisely what I think is going on. Russia is playing an interesting game and uncanny game. They’re chess players, and when they make a statement in the press through their state-controlled media they’re responding to deep, themes and memes in Western society. It’s uncanny how accurate they are. Now, recently President Putin has appointed a new advisor, Anton Vaino, whose academic spe- cialty is predictive programming analysis models. There is a physics component in his thinking. The Russians, in other words, have their hands on some physics and analysis technology, and now the advisor reports directly to President Putin. I expect Russia to retell these kinds of stories often. It’s going to be interesting to watch. Fitts: It’s almost like we’re converging here on Asimov’s The Foundation. Farrell: Exactly. I think the Russians know, and the West has had similar knowledge for a long time. The Russians are pushing it out into the open. Fitts: Brzezinski’s article indicates that our com- petitors have gotten closer on military technol- ogy, and a few accomplishments in the advanced technology can flip the whole global model. He describes things very calmly, but if the Chinese and the Russians get a leg up on new advanced technology, the financial model can flip. If the Chinese get dominance in the South China Sea, they could flip the whole currency model. Farrell: Yes, and I think Brzezinski is asking “What are we getting for our money?” Well, we’re getting the F-35 fighter, which has so far been a trillion-dollar boondoggle. It still doesn’t work. We’re getting the USS Gerald Ford, the United States’ navy’s multibillion-dollar aircraft carrier. It has electrical systems that don’t work. We’re getting the F-22 Raptor that doesn’t work as advertised. We’re spending money for things not working well. The Russians have just demonstrated in Syria and the Donald Cook incident, jamming capabilities that they have that can knock our put systems out at little cost to them. In other words, the Russians, in particular, have invested money wisely in modernizing their mil- itary. What I’m suggesting is that all that money that has been awash in the black budget and in the hidden system of finance is no return on in- vestment. It’s not a wise return anymore. Fitts: Right. Farrell: It’s not boding well for the US military, and I think you see a pause and an attempt to backtrack a bit in the Middle East and elsewhere. They realize that we might be picking a fight with the wrong people. Yes, I think Brzezinski’s subtext is that even that part of the system is not giving us the return on investment we need. Fitts: It’s funny. One of the themes that came up for me more in the 3rd quarter than in the 2nd quarter is this question: “Are our minds our own?” And how much are we being influenced by entrainment, propaganda, and hidden tech- nologies or techniques?