Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 8054 CERN is at the top of the list. We will get into the reasons for this. It is very important for people to understand, and I want to remind people that I’m just a hack from South Dakota. I’m not a particle physicist, I’m not a plasma physicist or anything else. I’m just looking at this as a rank amateur with an in- terest in physics. But when you look at the CERN Collider, it is actually five particle accelerators, the last of which is the 27-kilometer circular accelerator that is buried underground in rock. The import- ant thing is that CERN is doing particle physics. In other words, we spend billions of dollars to whirl what are fundamentally little mathematical packets of information in this huge machine and collide them to see what we get. To draw an analogy, we are taking two hand- made Swiss watches and slamming them to- gether and looking at the debris and saying, “Oh, this looks like it might have come from a clock.” That is what the physicists are telling us. I suspect a deeper physics project here. Point 1 is that the magnetic fields of the collider itself are, in some cases, eight times the local magnetic field strength of planet Earth itself. So, we are dealing with gigantic, man-made magnetic fields. When tinkering with magnetic fields that alter the local field strength of the planet, we should are see some kind of planetary resonance effect. It could affect, not only the planetary dynamo in the center of the planet, but also conceivably affect the magnetosphere itself. The second point is to ask, “How do you deter- mine that is the case?” Well, the way when the collider is actually func- tioning, is to look for data correlations. Is there a dip in the magnetic field strength of the magneto- sphere in the Northern Hemisphere of the planet? Lo and behold, when you dig for such things, you find dips. Are there any effects of dips, in turn, on solar activity because the magnetosphere of the sun and the earth are coupled? They do in fact touch each other in space. We are looking at a planetary machine, not a particle physics machine. The third point is electrical circuitry, no matter how simple or complicated. One of my favor- ite heroes in physics is a Hungarian electrical engineer named Gabriel Kron. In the 1930s he pointed out back, that you could take the tensor calculus of Einstein’s unified field theory and use it to describe the anomalies that electrical engi- neers discovered in things like transients, phase creep, etc, in large networked electrical systems, and particularly in rotated ones. That’s to say that ordinary electrical circuitry can be described mathematically only in higher di- mensional mathematics. He is really meant that any ordinary electrical circuit – no matter how simple or how small – is actually a hyper-dimen- sional machine, touching other dimensions. Now magnify that to the scale of CERN and you’re dealing, therefore, with a hyper-dimen- sional physics machine on an enormous scale. Fitts: When I look at CERN, I have questions. One is, “Are we bringing down the walls between two dimensions intentionally”? Farrell: That is one thing I think possible. There are a number of people – Anthony Patch proba- bly being the most prominent – who are looking at CERN in Biblical terms, such as creating por- tals for the devil to come through. I don’t look at it that way, but his point is also mine. We are dealing with a hyper-dimensional machine, and the CERN staff has admitted pub- licly it is looking for higher dimensions. The staff is telling us that this machine is not simply about physics; it’s something else. There is yet another level to CERN: being a sov- ereign entity. It’s like the Bank for International Settlements and, in a certain sense, is a cosmol- ogy cartel. It can negotiate loans and financing all on its own, and no sovereign nation has any say, although Germany has the heaviest interest in CERN. CERN, because of this sovereignty, can control the flow of information; it can classify things all on its own. I think this control indicates a II. News Trends & Stories