Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 8055 deeper project. Now let’s go back to the internet. CERN cre- ates literally billions of particle collisions every picosecond. That in turn means that CERN is generating so much information in a minute of its operation that it exceeds all previous human knowledge. Fitts: Wow! It’s creating its own field. Farrell: Precisely. It’s creating an information field that, in turn, has computers programmed to select interesting collisions, which they present to scientists to analyze. The first information filter for CERN is a computer. Most scientists working with CERN are not physically in Switzerland; most are scattered all around the world and getting their results through the internet. This means, theoretically, that you could have several filters that we never hear of at work in the computer programs pull- ing information for scientists to analyze. I am suggesting that a secret filter pulls the really interesting things, not having anything to do with particle physics, but having more to do with hyper-dimensional torsion field effect or gravity effect, and presenting it to secret committees of scientists to analyze. CERN really is huge. In quantum mechan- ics, you have the observer effect. It goes to the Heisenberg uncertainty principle. You cannot measure the position and velocity of an electron at the same time. That is to say, prior to running an experiment, we already determine the out- come by determining what to look for. Do you follow me? Fitts: Yes. Farrell: So, physics is observer based. Now let’s magnify to the macro scale. If physics is observer based – and you’ve done interviews with Dr. William Tiller, because he’s getting into the same phenomenon – then we ask, can consciousness directly and without any physical connection to a system influence the state of the system itself? The answer is, “Yes, it can.” Fitts: Yes, of course. Farrell: Now let’s amplify it to the CERN scale. Let’s imagine that we doing physics experiments and we recognize that consciousness may play a role in physical reality far beyond what we envi- sion. When the CERN staff runs experiments, it is also secretly using their computer filters, run- ning what I call data correlation experiments. Further, when CERN is turned on, do we no- tice any increase or decrease in certain types of human activity? Do we notice changes in moods, emotions, financial markets, decisions, and so on Given how such enormous computers with enor- mous algorithms filter data, the possibility exists that CERN could run a social engineering phys- ics experiment on data correlations of planetary effects of changes in the magnetosphere. I think CERN is running such a gigantic experiment. If that experiment is really the fact, then science is about replication. The CERN problem is that we trust the people running CERN to tell us ex- actly what it finds. But when CERN is sovereign, it has no need to tell us everything. It is possible that CERN is not telling. So China wants to build its own bigger facility. I suspect that China thinks along the same lines –“We want to build our own machine and to find out for ourselves.” Other countries want the same thing. Russia does, and Germany wants to build a bigger one just for itself. So, we are dealing with a planetary machine, with a planetary physics experiment, with a planetary social engineering experiment, and research into consciousness, physics, and higher dimensional workings. Fitts: We must do an interview just on CERN. Farrell: Yes. It’s worthwhile. Fitts: Absolutely. Now let me turn to inspira- tion, because the 3rd quarter was an uncertain period when someone might say to you, “Please just nuke us now. End the pain.” But there was inspiration too. In fact, some of the movies I’m using this month are really inspired me during the quarter. Rather than picking out the ones that inspired “ CERN creates literally billions of particle collisions every pico- second. That in turn means that CERN is generating so much information in a minute of its opera- tion that it exceeds all previous human knowledge. ”